Reviews the Fearless Organization by Amy C Edmondson
Encounter a Problem?
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Friend Reviews
Community Reviews
Notes:
Recommended by Matthew McDaniel
Librar
It'due south unmanly to admit, but sometimes I'chiliad afraid. I worry about what might happen. Sometimes the problem is beyond my strength. I can attest that if anxiety takes hold, information technology dominates my thoughts. This leads to my biggest point of agreement with Amy Edmondson. Y'all can't retrieve clearly when you're afraid. I want to create a safe environs in my office. I don't desire my team to fire calories on anxiety so that they don't have the resources to do their all-time.Notes:
Recommended by Matthew McDaniel
Library book
Psychological prophylactic is broadly defined every bit a climate in which people are comfortable expressing and being themselves. More specifically, when people have psychological safety at work, they feel comfy sharing concerns and mistakes without costless of embarrassment out retribution (xvi)
Psychological safety was far and away the most of import of the five Dynamics we found (xviii)
fear inhibits learning. Research in Neuroscience shows that fright consumes physiological resources, diverting them from parts of the encephalon that manage working memory and process new data. This impairs analytic thinking, artistic insight, and problem solving (14)
how psychologically safe a person feels strongly shapes the propensity to appoint in learning behaviors, such as information sharing, asking for aid, or experimenting. It likewise affects employee satisfaction (fourteen)
psychological safety exists when people experience their workplace is an environment where they can speak upwardly, offering ideas, and ask questions without fear of being punished or embarrassed (xv)
VUCA - volatility, dubiety, complexity, and ambiguity (19)
people often hold back even when they believe that what they take to say could be important for the organization, for the customer, or for themselves (31)
Workaround = accomplishes the immediate goal but knows nothing to diagnose or solve the trouble that triggered the work around in the first place (37)
* leaders who welcome only good news create fear that blocks them from hearing the truth
* many managers confuse setting high standards with adept direction
* a lack of psychological safety tin can create an illusion of success that eventually turns into serious business failures
* early information about shortcomings can nearly always mitigate the size and impact of future, big - scale failure (71)
Freedom to fail (109)
Extreme artlessness - no one has the right to hold a disquisitional opinion without speaking up nearly it" (109). Personal note : this could probably be taken as well far
Leaders who are willing to say I don't know play a surprisingly powerful role in engaging the hearts and minds of employees (124)
The most important skill to principal is that a framing the piece of work (158)
emphasizing a sense of purpose... Motivating people by articulating a compelling purpose is a well - established leadership chore (166)
productive responses are characterized by three elements: expressions of appreciation, and sanctioning clear violations (173)
You can't take also much psychological safety, just y'all can take too picayune subject (196)
...more thanInterestingly as well, several tables and sections throughout the book list common mindsets that are antithetical to psychologica
Powerful, emotion invoking case studies and stories showcase the role psychological safety plays in the success and failure of teams, projects, events and endeavors. The fearless organisation is a volume that leads by example. While explanations illuminate the anecdotes, the stories themselves speak to the necessity of creating workplaces that cover people speaking up.Interestingly as well, several tables and sections throughout the book list common mindsets that are antonymous to psychological safe, which I am sure many readers volition chronicle to. Existence able to meet and articulate the problems around you is immensely powerful, and The Fearless Organization is a neat lens with which to view them.
...more"Psychological safety is broadly divers as a climate in which people are comfortable expressing and beingness themselves. More specifically, when people have psychological prophylactic at work, they feel comfy sharing concerns and mistakes without fear of embarrassment or retribution. They are confident that they can speak up and won't be humiliated, ignored, or blamed. They know they tin can ask questions when they are unsure about something. They tend to trust and respect their colleagues. When a work surround has reasonably high psychological rubber, good things happen: mistakes are reported quickly and then that prompt corrective activity can be taken; seamless coordination across groups or departments is enabled, and potentially game-changing ideas for innovation are shared. In curt, psychological safety is a crucial source of value cosmos in organizations operating in a complex, changing environment."
Fear inhibits learning. Research in neuroscience shows that fear consumes physiological resource, diverting them from parts of the brain that manage working memory and process new information. This impairs analytic thinking, creative insight, and trouble solving.
How psychologically safe a person feels strongly shapes the propensity to engage in learning behaviors, such as information sharing, asking for help, or experimenting. It as well affects employee satisfaction .
VUCA - volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambivalence
Leaders toolkit for edifice psychological safety:
one. A leader must set up the stage past framing the piece of work (setting the expectations and clarifying the need for voice) and emphasizing the purpose (identifying what's at stake, why it matters and for whom) so that he accomplishes an atmosphere of shared expectations and pregnant.
2. A leader must invite participation past demonstrating situational humility (admitting gaps), practicing inquiry (asking good questions) and setting upwards structures and processes (creating forums and providing guidelines for give-and-take).
3. Responding productively which encompasses expressing appreciation, destigmatizing failure, and sanctioning clear violations which, in turn, should achieve company-broad orientation toward continuous learning.
"Bureaucracy (or, more specifically, the fear it creates when not handled well) reduces psychological safety."
"High standards in a context where there is uncertainty or interdependence (or both) combined with a lack of psychological safe comprise a recipe for suboptimal operation."
"Low levels of psychological safety can create a culture of silence (artificial harmony). They tin also create a Cassandra civilisation—an environment in which speaking up is belittled and warnings go unheeded."
"Cheating and roofing up are natural by-products of a pinnacle-down culture that does not take "no" or "it can't exist done" for an respond. Only combining this culture with a belief that a brilliant strategy formulated in the by volition concord indefinitely into the future becomes a certain recipe for failure."
"failure of an employee to speak upwards in a crucial moment cannot exist seen. This is true whether that employee is on the front lines of customer service or sitting next to you in the executive board room. And because not offering an idea is an invisible act, information technology'due south hard to engage in real-fourth dimension course correction. This means that psychologically safe workplaces have a powerful advantage in competitive industries."
...moreI suppose that a book like this serves a purpose in getting the discussion out that this is an important upshot. A much better book could take come from taking Chapter vii as a bones outline and developing from in that location.
...moreI knew about the google example from earlier and had the privilege of working for good organisations and so far. Hence I bought the primary merits on page x of the volume. Hearing more than and mor This volume reminded me of what the Anna Karenina-principle. Successful organisations are frequently alike i another, whereas every failed organisation (usually) has an interesting story to tell. Yet, avoiding mistakes will just get you lot so far (as the author does point out), so doing things correct takes gut and try.
I knew about the google example from before and had the privilege of working for expert organisations so far. Hence I bought the main claim on page 10 of the book. Hearing more than and more failed examples was entertaining, but I came here for tips on implementing, not for horror stories. There was a actually proficient volume hiding in there, but I felt it took a bit likewise many pages before information technology started uncover.
Full five stars for the topic, though. No question regarding that part of it :)
...more thanThe author is not only very precise to depict the "psychological safety" concepts with scientific rigor, only also to address practical advices on how to implement these concepts in existent life.
One week later on reading this volume and I can feel positive changes on my behavior when dealing with people.
I hope this book can reach a broader au
Do you lot know those books that upgrade your understanding of the world and enact existent skillful changes in your life? This is what "The fearless organization" was to me.The writer is not only very precise to describe the "psychological safety" concepts with scientific rigor, merely also to address practical advices on how to implement these concepts in existent life.
One week afterwards reading this book and I tin feel positive changes on my behavior when dealing with people.
I hope this volume can achieve a broader audience and help to create a whole new earth of omnipresent psychological rubber
...moreSome of Amy Edmoson's articles and blogs give you the same info with no narrative behind but accomplish the same goal perfectly.
This book is a smooth read to get a bit more insight into the research and instance studies around psychological rubber. Nevertheless, y'all can come across the tension between a well researched scholastic book and an piece of cake how to guide for business people. Unfortunately It ends up falling curt in both categories.Some of Amy Edmoson's manufactures and blogs give you the same info with no narrative backside but reach the same goal perfectly.
...moreIt happens all the fourth dimension where I work--my employees are coming out with so many great solutions--I am impressed! Only you know what is more impressing still? They are impressed themselves that they could provide such an amazing feedback--and that the company is giving them credit for it.
I am so glad I am learning how to create a safety environment for them at work. The learning never ends! we can make it ameliorate nonetheless-we can start spreading it to all departments too. Read this book--you will love it for sure. And I sure hope you tin start practicing at piece of work, at habitation and at school.
...more"Request questions tends not to make the leader seem, non weak, only thoughtful and wise....rules of thumb for asking a good question:
1) yous don't know the answer
2) you enquire questions that d not limit the response options to y
"Asking questions tends not to brand the leader seem, not weak, just thoughtful and wise....rules of thumb for asking a good question:
i) you don't know the answer
two) you ask questions that d not limit the response options to yes or no
3) you phrase the question in a way that helps others share their thinking in a focused way.
...powerful questions, those that inspire, provoke, and shift people'southward thinking. Attributes:
1) generates curiosity in the listener
two) stimulates reflective chat
3) is thought provoking
4) surfaces underlying assumptions
v) invites inventiveness and new possibilities
6) generates free energy and forward motion
7) channels attention and focuses enquiry
8) stays with participants
9) touches a deep meaning
10) evokes more questions"
"Have I antiseptic the boundaries? Exercise people know what constitutes blame worthy acts in our organization? Do I respond to clear violations in an accordingly tough manner so as to influence future behavior?"
...more thanThe book is dedicated to a very clear topic (psychological safety as a foundation of successful organizations) & I think it does what's promised - covers the topic end-to-finish. But I couldn't assistance a feeling that what was truly essential was covered in the chapter ane and the residuum of the volume is non much more than a repetition ;/
What did I like? There are good & relevant examples, there's articulate description what's the deviation between fearless & over-protective (I can't recall the exact
4.5 starsThe volume is dedicated to a very clear topic (psychological safety as a foundation of successful organizations) & I think it does what's promised - covers the topic end-to-end. But I couldn't help a feeling that what was truly essential was covered in the chapter 1 and the residue of the book is not much more than than a repetition ;/
What did I like? There are good & relevant examples, there's clear clarification what'due south the difference between fearless & over-protective (I tin't call back the exactly wording here), at that place's a nice answer to the question about visible successes of some companies ruled in typically hierarchical, loftier-stress style. You can also find hither psychological aspects of fear & how it impacts (on a psychosomatic level) our capabilities. There'southward also a dainty chapter nigh Candor - zero you could discover in "Radical Candor", just it'south expert enough to fit the context hither.
In general - a expert book, that quite nicely wraps the topic upwardly.
...more…
Amy Edmondson takes quite some time to ascertain what Psychological Safety is. And probably fifty-fifty more time to specify what it is not
…
I have defined psychological safety as the belief that the work environment is rubber for interpersonal risk taking. The concept refers to the feel of feeling able to speak up with relevant ideas, questions, or concerns. Psychological safety is present when colleagues tr #thefearlessorganization by #amyedmondson @harvardhbs #harvardbusinessschool #wileypublishing
…
Amy Edmondson takes quite some fourth dimension to ascertain what Psychological Safety is. And probably even more time to specify what it is not
…
I have divers psychological condom as the belief that the work surround is rubber for interpersonal hazard taking. The concept refers to the experience of feeling able to speak up with relevant ideas, questions, or concerns. Psychological safety is present when colleagues trust and respect each other and feel able – even obligated – to be candid
…
Psychological safety isn't about beingness nice
…
Psychological rubber isn't a personality factor
…
Psychological safety isn't just some other word for trust
…
Psychological safety isn't well-nigh lowering performance standards
…
In any challenging manufacture setting, leaders take two vital tasks. 1, they must build psychological prophylactic to spur learning and avoid preventable failures; 2, they must set up loftier standards and inspire and enable people to reach them. Setting high standards remains a crucial management job. So does sharing, sharpening, and continually emphasizing a worthy purpose
…
A peachy read for any #leader and in any organization or context
…
Have you #read this #volume? What do you think? ...more than
Information density is simply ok and applied awarding tips are pretty generic.
The bad: it is not well written (both the 5 Dysfunctions and Radical Candor are much more fun to read) and since Edmondson is a professor it lacks the useful, practical advice Scott (who has bodily feel managing at Google and Apple tree) gives in her bo At that place is a good chance I would have given this book a better rating had it non been my third in a row on the topic of building well-functioning teams (the other two being Leonconi's "The V Dysfunctions of a Squad" and Scott's "Radical Candor").
The bad: it is not well written (both the 5 Dysfunctions and Radical Candor are much more fun to read) and since Edmondson is a professor it lacks the useful, practical advice Scott (who has actual experience managing at Google and Apple) gives in her book.
The skilful: Since Edmondson is a professor it is the only book of the three that actually backs up its findings with peer-reviewed studies. Thus it is a proficient complement to the other 2 books. It is comforting to know that there is actual research supporting some of the intuitions of Leonconi and Scott. Edmondson is also the ane deserving credit for coining the term psychological safe. So perhaps non surprisingly, she also has the best definition I've heard to appointment: Psychological safety is "the belief that the work surround is rubber for interpersonal take a chance-taking."
Last simply not least, I know I only complained nigh the lack of useful advice in this book (which–who knows–I might feel differently about, had I read the books in dissimilar order), only there is 1 nugget subconscious at the very end of the book that I'll leave you with: the best fashion to plant an environs of psychological safety is to act as though information technology already exists. ...more
Past citing several well known cases, and exploring epic failures that created losses for society style across the companies and their stakeholders, the writer really drives habitation the point that leaders need to mind to their staff. She points o
If you accept ever been part of a team that was not performing at its acme potential, with lots of hushed whispers about office politics, so you must read Edmondson's well researched and concise book on how to conquer the bad, and reach for concern greatness.Past citing several well known cases, and exploring epic failures that created losses for society way across the companies and their stakeholders, the author really drives home the point that leaders need to mind to their staff. She points out how hard it can be to speak upwards, and provides strategies for workers and managers to actually learn and better.
On the other paw, the existent world is such that I don't see most organizations becoming fearless anytime soon. Human nature, strict hierarchy, status quo bias, and other nefarious realities volition work their hardest to go on people in their place. I recall the writer could've gone deeper into just how difficult it is to be a whistle blower and why these fears are real and founded, being a permanent constraint on progress for organizations of all types.
...more thanRelated Articles
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign y'all in to your Goodreads business relationship.
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40275161-the-fearless-organization
0 Response to "Reviews the Fearless Organization by Amy C Edmondson"
Post a Comment